
| AUSTRIA |
11.8
|
ITALY |
1.0
|
CZECH REP. |
4.1
|
| BELGIUM |
9.4
|
NETHERLANDS |
3.4
|
HUNGARY |
2.9
|
| FINLAND |
5.3
|
PORTUGAL |
16.1
|
POLAND |
2.9
|
| FRANCE |
10.3
|
SPAIN |
9.9
|
SLOVAKIA |
11.3
|
| GERMANY |
13.8
|
SWEDEN |
2.8
|
SLOVENIA |
28.6
|
| GREECE |
5.5
|
UNITED KINGDOM |
3.3
|
SWITZERLAND |
5.8
|
| IRELAND |
3.4
|
EUROPEAN UNION |
8.0
|
The French consensus |
| They are among the European drivers that drink often, but
in moderate quantities... They reject all idea of complete ban of alcohol
at the wheel and wish a raising of legal level. But nevertheless they try,
in a great majority, to observe the legal limits (firstly because they are
afraid of being checked). On the other hand, they think that breathtesters
may help, because they are supporting the idea of having such a device on
board their vehicle. In fact, the fight against illegal drinking and driving is globally quite well accepted in this country... If one excepts a 'hard core', between 6 and 7% car drivers, who are either chronic drinkers or occasional drinkers, in the latter case often being young with a "Scandinavian" consumption. Those targets should be made aware of drink-driving in priority. Without diminishing the efforts towards other drivers. |
Comment
In the light of these various considerations, the SARTRE 2 recommendations are going mainly in two directions. On the one hand, it seems necessary to work with the purpose of increasing the perception of risk related to alcohol in all countries where an important part of the population still refuse to admit a limit of blood alcohol concentration when driving. It is indeed the best way to render drivers more responsible. On the other hand, we must support the rising of legal measures, but also and mostly to have more enforcement of these measures to avoid the feeling that the likelihood of being checked is almost non-existent...